Vol. 1 No. 01 (2020)
Articles

The Investigation of The Different Types of the Ground Rebar Spacers with Proposing New Design Rebar Space Mixed of Concrete Plastic

Sevar Neamat
University of Zakho, Kurdistan Region - Iraq
Mahmood Shamsborhan
University of Zakho, Kurdistan Region - Iraq

Published 2020-07-22

Keywords

  • Rebar spacer,
  • concrete-plastic rebar spacer,
  • ground spacer,
  • new design of rebar spacer

How to Cite

[1]
S. Neamat and M. . Shamsborhan, “The Investigation of The Different Types of the Ground Rebar Spacers with Proposing New Design Rebar Space Mixed of Concrete Plastic”, JoCEF, vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 01-06, Jul. 2020.

Abstract

The reinforcing spacers are commonly prepared from cementitious material, plastic, or metals. These spacers are prepared to provide the reinforcing steel with ensuring that the requested concrete cover thickness is attained to guard surrounded steel from corrosion. Also, they pretend a vital role in the concrete structure performance. The toughness of reinforced concrete buildings remains extremely reliant on the features of the protection of concrete to be strong with thickness. A disappointment in finding cover thickness is considered the main impact on early deterioration within the steel, whichever in chance is a chief weaken method in reinforced concrete constructions. The specified study offerings a review study on the investigation of the advantages and disadvantages of six factors in various types concerning the ground rebar spacers studies. As a result, different types of ground rebar spacers have been compared and the new rebar spacer has been designed mixed of concrete_ plastic material

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. “BSI, BS 7973-1: Spacers and chairs for steel reinforcement and their specification in Part 1: Product performance requirements. 2001.”
  2. S. Alzyoud, H. Wong, and N. Buenfeld, “Influence of reinforcement spacers on mass transport properties and durability of concrete structures,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 87, pp. 31–44, 2016.
  3. S. Neamat, “Factors Affecting Project Performance in Kurdistan Region of Iraq,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 4, no. 5, Art. no. 5.
  4. S. Neamat and I. Yitmen, “Factors Affecting the Innovation and Competitiveness in Kurdistan Region of Iraq Construction Industry,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. IJAERS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2017, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.4.2.31.
  5. S. D. Salahaddin, “Factors Affecting the Competitiveness and Innovation in Northern Iraq Construction Industry,” 2016.
  6. D. Spekkink, “Performance based design of buildings,” Perform. Based Build. Themat. Netw. PeBBu Domain, vol. 3, p. 29, 2005.
  7. A. NBR, “15.575-1-Edificações habitacionais-Desempenho-Requisitos gerais,” Assoc. Bras. Normas Téc. Rio Jan., p. 71, 2013.
  8. S. Neamat, H. Karimi, and S. Galali, “Application of Mathematical Matrices for Environmental Impact Assessment, A Case Study of Thermal Power Plant,” J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2020.
  9. “COMITÉ EURO-INTERNATIONAL DU BÉTON (CEB). Bulletin d’Information No. 201 — Spacers, chairs and tying of steel reinforcement. Lausanne: Comité Euro-International du Béton, 1990. [.”
  10. “COMITÉ EURO-INTERNATIONAL DU BÉTON (CEB). Bulletin d’Information No. 201 — Spacers, chairs and tying of steel reinforcement. Lausanne: Comité Euro-International du Béton, 1990. [.”
  11. “BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION (BSI). BS 7973: Spacers and chairs for steel reinforcement and their specification – Part 1: Product performance requirements. UK, 2001.”
  12. “BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION (BSI). BS 7973: Spacers and chairs for steel reinforcement and their specification – Part 1: Product performance requirements. UK, 2001.”
  13. M. Barreto, A. Maran, D. Dal Molin, and J. Masuero, “Performance evaluation of plastic spacers: proposal and development of evaluation methods,” Rev. IBRACON Estrut. E Mater., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 911–952, 2016.
  14. “VAQUERO, J. Separadores para hormigón estructural. Zuncho n13. Septiembre, 2007.”
  15. S. Neamat, “Models Developed for Creep of High Strength Concrete,” Int. J. CivilMechanical Energy Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 174–180, 2017.
  16. S. Neamat, “Risk Assessment for Uzun Construction and Real Estate Company in TRNC,” Sch. J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 332–343, 2018.
  17. H. Karimi, S. Neamat, and S. Galali, “Application of Mathematical Matrices for Environmental Impact Assessment, A Case Study of Thermal Power Plant,” J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2020.
  18. S. Neamat, “A Developed Framework for Energy Technology Sustainability Assessment,” Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng IJITEE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 832–838, 2019.
  19. S. D. S. Neamat, “A Comparative Study of Safety Leading and Lagging Indicators Measuring Project Safety Performance,” Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst J, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 306–312, 2019.